User talk:Chance997: Difference between revisions

Hello, Chance997! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahousea friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your disruptive behavior, whatever its intentions, is likely to result in sanctions against your account. Blanking your talk page does not hide your previous actions; we can all see the page history and it will be relevant to us if this pattern of behavior continues. Please heed the warnings that have been repeatedly brought to you. silviaASH (inquire within) 06:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would add to this that requesting your earlier draft to be deleted, before straight away recreating it, does not ‘reset the clock’ in any sense. A record of your edits and draft creations/deletions/etc. remains in the log, and even deleted pages can be seen by administrators. Your behaviour is rapidly getting into the areas of tendentious editing and gaming the system, neither of which is helpful, and I must warn you you’re closer to being sanctioned than you probably realise. Please stop this now. Thank you. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:16, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop wasting people’s time, or you will be blocked. Cullen328 (talk) 07:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are already on a final warning. Have they already violated it? Sergecross73 msg me 14:43, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All right. Chance997 (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’d say whether or not Chance has crossed the line is up to you. They have definitely pushed the limits of my patience though. silviaASH (inquire within) 17:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know about you guys, but I had to explain to Chance that an hour is the same as 60 minutes in this discussion: Draft talk:The Flash (1990 film)#Notability?. (The draft, like a few of their other ones, is a WP:CONTENTFORK.) Trailblazer101 (talk) 04:47, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The likelihood that Chance is a minor seems fairly strong to me. Whether or not that is true is none of our business and they are not required to tell us that (and I think it is in their best interest to not say so if they are- If this is so, then I hope all the identifying personal information they’ve posted on their userpage(s) is mostly or entirely fictitious, for their own sake). Still, we should nonetheless keep that possibility in mind and be patient with them, even if it is a little bit annoying.

Chance, if you are in fact under 18, I recommend you read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. silviaASH (inquire within) 05:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]