From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|
:{{ping|331dot}} Thank you for reviewing my appeal. Yes, “Rethopsis” is entirely fictional. I created it as a creative project without understanding Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I deeply regret this mistake and acknowledge that Wikipedia is not a platform for imaginative content. My username is unrelated to any real entity and was chosen as a personal pseudonym. I am not affiliated with any organization. If unblocked, I will focus solely on improving existing articles (e.g., expanding [[Thoth]]or [[Osiris]]entries) using reliable, published sources. I will avoid any speculative or promotional edits. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]]([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
:{{ping|331dot}} Thank you for reviewing my appeal. Yes, “Rethopsis” is entirely fictional. I created it as a creative project without understanding Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I deeply regret this mistake and acknowledge that Wikipedia is not a platform for imaginative content. My username is unrelated to any real entity and was chosen as a personal pseudonym. I am not affiliated with any organization. If unblocked, I will focus solely on improving existing articles (e.g., expanding [[Thoth]]or [[Osiris]]entries) using reliable, published sources. I will avoid any speculative or promotional edits. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]]([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 09:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*{{u|Hammersoft}} Any comments? [[User:331dot|331dot]]([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
*{{u|Hammersoft}} Any comments? [[User:331dot|331dot]]([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 09:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
*:Thank you for reviewing my appeal. Yes, “Rethopsis” is entirely fictional. I created it as a creative project without understanding Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I deeply regret this mistake and acknowledge that Wikipedia is not a platform for imaginative content. My username is unrelated to any real entity and was chosen as a personal pseudonym. I am not affiliated with any organization. If unblocked, I will focus solely on improving existing articles (e.g., expanding [[Thoth]]or [[Osiris]]entries) using reliable, published sources. I will avoid any speculative or promotional edits. Like i said before. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]]([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 09:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 09:50, 30 January 2025
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Rethopsis (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologize for my earlier edits promoting "Rethopsis," which violated Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I now understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for advertising or creative projects. While my username may have been misinterpreted, I confirm it does not represent any business, organization, or group—it is purely a personal pseudonym. I am not compensated by any entity for editing. If unblocked, I will focus exclusively on constructive contributions, such as improving articles about ancient Egyptian mythology with verifiable, sourced content. I will avoid any promotional or speculative edits. Thank you for reconsidering. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]] ([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for my earlier edits promoting "Rethopsis," which violated Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I now understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for advertising or creative projects. While my username may have been misinterpreted, I confirm it does not represent any business, organization, or group—it is purely a personal pseudonym. I am not compensated by any entity for editing. If unblocked, I will focus exclusively on constructive contributions, such as improving articles about ancient Egyptian mythology with verifiable, sourced content. I will avoid any promotional or speculative edits. Thank you for reconsidering. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]] ([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for my earlier edits promoting "Rethopsis," which violated Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I now understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a platform for advertising or creative projects. While my username may have been misinterpreted, I confirm it does not represent any business, organization, or group—it is purely a personal pseudonym. I am not compensated by any entity for editing. If unblocked, I will focus exclusively on constructive contributions, such as improving articles about ancient Egyptian mythology with verifiable, sourced content. I will avoid any promotional or speculative edits. Thank you for reconsidering. [[User:Rethopsis|Rethopsis]] ([[User talk:Rethopsis#top|talk]]) 07:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
So, “Rethopsis” is a fictional organization? 331dot (talk) 09:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- @331dot: Thank you for reviewing my appeal. Yes, “Rethopsis” is entirely fictional. I created it as a creative project without understanding Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I deeply regret this mistake and acknowledge that Wikipedia is not a platform for imaginative content. My username is unrelated to any real entity and was chosen as a personal pseudonym. I am not affiliated with any organization. If unblocked, I will focus solely on improving existing articles (e.g., expanding Thoth or Osiris entries) using reliable, published sources. I will avoid any speculative or promotional edits. Rethopsis (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hammersoft Any comments? 331dot (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for reviewing my appeal. Yes, “Rethopsis” is entirely fictional. I created it as a creative project without understanding Wikipedia’s policies against original fiction and promotion. I deeply regret this mistake and acknowledge that Wikipedia is not a platform for imaginative content. My username is unrelated to any real entity and was chosen as a personal pseudonym. I am not affiliated with any organization. If unblocked, I will focus solely on improving existing articles (e.g., expanding Thoth or Osiris entries) using reliable, published sources. I will avoid any speculative or promotional edits. Like i said before. Rethopsis (talk) 09:50, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
